Saturday, December 13, 2008

Weighing in on a hotly debated controversy.

Tights are not pants.

I saw a girl on the train the other day wearing a fleece jacket and a pair of tights. I couldn't help thinking, how is the girl walking around without any pants on.

If you purchase it in the lingerie department, it's not pants.

Edit: I just realized how funny this post would be for an English reader. So, in translation, tights are not trousers!

Edit #2: Awesome visual via gofugyourself.celebuzz.com:



Ok, now picture someone riding the train in this, only the dress/tunic thing is a North Face Fleece.

4 comments:

Jen (MahaloFashion) said...

yeah i think people have fogotten that fact, I fell into that trap the other day and wore a top that could double as a dress with tights but it turns out it was way too short so I had to run home and change for work. I had to realize that tights were not pants and I needed to wear something that fully covered me.

Severn said...

i agree completely, especially when one's outfit is horrible to begin with.

*shudder*


anyways, awesome blog. totally digging the header, i'm so gay for kate lanphear.

MinervaO said...

Amen to that. It's unsanitary, and no one needs to see anyone else's bum that closely in public.

The Clothes Horse said...

I 100% agree!